2022 NFL Draft grades for each Spherical 2 and three choose, together with an A for 49ers and D for Bears

not fairly 2022 NFL Draft grades for each Spherical 2 and three choose, together with an A for 49ers and D for Bears will lid the most recent and most present advice one thing just like the world. proper of entry slowly because of this you comprehend competently and appropriately. will enlargement your data adroitly and reliably

Welcome to our pick-by-pick second- and third-round grades of the 2022 NFL Draft.

For these of you who suppose we must always wait just a few years earlier than grading the picks, we disagree. NFL groups must make selections beneath uncertainty. So we must always consider them based mostly on what we all know on the time of the choose. The grades beneath will replicate not solely the standard of the prospects but additionally the method — in different phrases, whether or not it’s a smart use of assets given the state of the franchise.

Having mentioned that, be at liberty to report me to Old Takes Exposed in a pair years when these look silly.

Stats are courtesy of The Beast or Professional Soccer Focus except in any other case famous.

Spherical 2

33. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Logan Corridor, Edge/DL, Houston

Corridor (6-foot-6, 283) might line up at defensive finish on base downs, however his worth will seemingly come as an inside move rusher. That’s one thing that each crew’s in search of, and it’s exhausting to seek out. Corridor had 6.5 sacks and 13.5 tackles for loss final season whereas lining up at totally different spots alongside Houston’s entrance. His athleticism ought to pop in opposition to inside offensive linemen within the NFL. Including move rush makes full sense for the Bucs.

Grade: B+

34. Inexperienced Bay Packers: Christian Watson, WR, North Dakota State

The Packers despatched the Vikings the 53rd and 59th picks to maneuver as much as 34. Watson (6-foot-4, 208) has a formidable dimension/velocity (ran 4.36) profile. He caught 43 balls for 801 yards and 7 touchdowns final 12 months and averaged 20.4 yards per reception in his profession. He examined out as the highest athlete amongst this class of huge receivers.

However there are some strikes in opposition to Watson. He had a number of knee surgical procedures through the 2019 offseason and missed three video games final 12 months due to a hamstring damage. All of Watson’s video games got here in opposition to FCS competitors. And per PFF, he had a excessive 13.3% drop fee in his profession.

There are apparent instruments to work with, however Watson will probably be a 23-year-old rookie and can seemingly want a while to grow to be a top quality vertical risk within the NFL. The Packers might need been higher off holding on to the 2 picks and throwing a pair darts at huge receiver. Watson is much from a positive factor.

Grade: C+

35. Tennessee Titans: Roger McCreary, CB, Auburn

McCreary (5-foot-11, 190) had a formidable faculty profession with 37 passes defended and 6 interceptions prior to now three seasons (35 video games). He’s sticky in protection and aggressive. However McCreary ran 4.5 and examined out as a below-average athlete. His 28 7/8-inch arms can be among the many shortest for corners within the NFL.

McCreary is a basic case of movie vs. measurables. I believe it is a cheap choose.

Grade: B

36. New York Jets: Breece Corridor, RB, Iowa State

The Jets gave up a fifth-round choose to maneuver up two spots. Corridor (5-foot-11, 217) is a whole again who did all of it for Iowa State. He carried 718 occasions for 3,941 yards (5.5 YPC) and 50 touchdowns in three seasons. Corridor additionally caught 82 balls for 734 yards and 6 touchdowns.

Per The Athletic’s Dane Brugler, he fumbled simply as soon as each 200 touches, and Corridor pressured the very best fee of missed tackles within the nation, per Sports activities Data Options (SIS).

Corridor is a wonderful prospect, however given the state of the Jets’ roster, I’m unsure they wanted to spend this excessive of a choose on a working again.

Grade: C

37. Houston Texans: Jalen Pitre, S, Baylor

Pitre (5-foot-11, 198) is one other enjoyable security prospect from this 12 months’s class. He began 32 video games at Baylor and stuffed up the stat sheet final 12 months — 76 tackles (18 for loss), three sacks, three pressured fumbles, 9 passes defended and two interceptions. Pitre dedicated zero penalties in 431 protection snaps. Per SIS, he lined up within the slot or within the field on 96% of his snaps.

Pitre is a hybrid defensive again who performs with a feisty persona. I like this transfer for Houston.

Grade: B+

38. Atlanta Falcons: Arnold Ebiketie, Edge, Penn State

The Falcons gave up a fourth-round choose to maneuver up 5 spots. Ebiketie (6-foot-2, 250) transferred from Temple to Penn State final 12 months and produced 9.5 sacks and 17 tackles for loss in 12 begins. He has 34 1/8-inch arms and examined as a top-five athlete amongst edge defenders on this draft class.

Ebiketie ranked within the prime 10 in each fast strain fee (how typically a participant produces strain in 2.5 seconds or much less) and true strain fee (how typically a participant produces strain on straight dropbacks), per SIS. He tasks as somebody who might start his profession as a rotational move rusher earlier than ultimately turning into a starter. The Falcons desperately want move rush. I don’t thoughts them getting a bit aggressive right here.

Grade: B

39. Chicago Bears: Kyler Gordon, CB, Washington

Gordon (6 ft, 194) began 17 video games for Washington and completed his profession with 14 passes defended and two interceptions. He performed each on the surface and within the slot. Gordon ranked tied for fifth in yards per protection snap allowed, per SIS. However he performed simply 69 snaps of true man protection, per PFF. Gordon regarded explosive on the sector, however he ran simply 4.52 and examined out as a mediocre athlete for a nook.

It’s honest to surprise when/how the Bears plan on placing supporting items round Justin Fields. However they only want good gamers at premium positions. It is a superb use of assets.

Grade: B


Kyler Gordon (Jeff Halstead / Icon Sportswire through Getty Photographs)

40. Seattle Seahawks: Boye Mafe, Edge, Minnesota

Mafe (6-foot-4, 261) got here on sturdy final 12 months with seven sacks and 10 tackles for loss. He began simply 13 video games in faculty, however there’s some cause to consider that Mafe is an ascending participant. He examined out as a top-five athlete amongst edge defenders on this 12 months’s class. The Seahawks want high quality starters at premium positions. Drafting Mafe makes good sense.

Grade: B

41. Seattle Seahawks: Kenneth Walker III, RB, Michigan State

Walker (5-foot-9, 211) was Brugler’s top-ranked working again. He carried 480 occasions for two,794 yards (5.8 YPC) and 35 touchdowns in 32 video games (12 begins). Walker’s 46 runs of 10+ yards had been second within the nation final 12 months. Per SIS, he completed second in yards after contact per try (3.8), and had only one fumble in 2021.

Let’s be clear: Walker is a superb prospect and a enjoyable participant. However the Seahawks proceed to indicate full disregard for positional worth. They’re paying Rashaad Penny $5.75 million and have large holes up and down the roster at premium positions (together with quarterback!). It’s unimaginable to consider that spending a excessive second-round choose on one other working again is an optimum use of their assets.

Grade: D

42. Minnesota Vikings: Andrew Sales space, CB, Clemson

The Vikings moved up 11 spots and swapped picks with the Colts. Moreover, they gave up picks 77 (third spherical) and 192 (sixth spherical). Minnesota additionally obtained 122 (fourth spherical) again in return.

Sales space (6 ft, 194) began 15 video games at Clemson and carried out nicely (14 passes defended, 5 interceptions). He was referred to as for only one penalty in 35 faculty video games. Sales space is a bodily, aggressive nook who ought to have the ability to play in any scheme.

The query is sturdiness. He didn’t take part in pre-draft athletic testing due to a strained quad and double hernia surgical procedure. And per Brugler, he missed time with a hamstring damage and a stinger final 12 months. Sales space beforehand had surgical procedure to restore a tear in his patella tendon and had knee tendonitis in highschool.

If Sales space can keep wholesome, this may very well be a home-run choose. However that’s clearly an enormous if. I don’t thoughts taking a swing on his upside right here.

Grade: B

43. New York Giants: Wan’Dale Robinson, WR, Kentucky

Robinson (5-foot-8, 178) started his profession at Nebraska earlier than transferring to Kentucky. He was terrific final 12 months, catching 104 balls for 1,334 yards and 7 touchdowns. Robinson ran a 4.44. He’s powerful, slippery and explosive.

Having mentioned that, Brugler had Robinson as his a hundred and fifth general participant. Taking him this excessive appears like a attain. My head is telling me to provide the Giants a nasty grade, however Robinson is simply such an thrilling participant and has a lot juice. I can’t crush them for falling in love right here.

Grade: B-

44. Houston Texans: John Metchie III, WR, Alabama

The Texans moved up 24 spots right here, giving up picks 68 (third spherical), 108 (fourth spherical) and 124 (fourth spherical) in return.

Metchie (5-foot-11, 187) was extremely productive final 12 months — 96 catches for 1,142 yards and eight touchdowns — earlier than struggling a torn ACL in December. He doesn’t have eye-popping measurables and possibly gained’t contribute instantly, given the damage, however Metchie is a wonderful route-runner who performs with toughness and power. He ought to have the ability to line up exterior or within the slot.

Metchie is a superb prospect, however I’m unsure he has the ceiling to warrant an aggressive transfer up by the Texans, particularly contemplating all of the holes on their roster.

Grade: C


John Metchie III (Mickey Welsh / The Montgomery Advertiser through USA TODAY Sports activities)

45. Baltimore Ravens: David Ojabo, Edge, Michigan

Ojabo (6-foot-4, 250) was on observe to be a first-round choose, however he tore his Achilles throughout Michigan’s professional day. He got here on sturdy final 12 months with 11 sacks, 12 tackles for loss and 5 pressured fumbles in 14 video games. He had the very best sack fee (3.8%) of any edge rusher on this 12 months’s class.

However Ojabo had performed simply 26 defensive snaps previous to final season, and now he faces a tricky restoration from a severe damage. The Ravens are the precise crew to take this gamble. They’ve an info edge, provided that Ojabo’s defensive coordinator from Michigan, Mike Macdonald, is now in Baltimore. And since the Ravens draft for quantity, they will afford to take these kinds of swings on upside.

Grade: A-

46. Detroit Lions: Josh Paschal, Edge, Kentucky

Paschal (6-foot-3, 268) has a tremendous story. Per Brugler, Paschal handled a lethal type of pores and skin most cancers in 2018 and had a tumor eliminated. He got here again to start out 35 video games the subsequent three seasons and was a three-time captain. Pascal had 5.5 sacks and 15.5 tackles for loss in 2021. He has a excessive motor and will have the flexibility to line up on the sting or as an inside move rusher.

This feels a bit excessive, provided that Brugler had Paschal as his 83rd-ranked prospect. However I don’t have a problem with the Lions attempting so as to add extra move rush.

Grade: B-

47. Washington Commanders: Phidarian Mathis, DT, Alabama

Mathis (6-foot-4, 310, 34 5/8-inch arms) began 20 video games for Alabama. He had 9 sacks and 12 tackles for loss final 12 months. Mathis lined up in a number of spots and must be scheme-versatile. He tasks as a disruptive participant in opposition to the run and will have some pass-rush upside.

The knocks on Mathis are that he’s already 24 years outdated, and he’s among the many worst athletes at defensive deal with on this 12 months’s class. I don’t love that mixture.

Grade: C

48. Chicago Bears: Jaquan Brisker, S, Penn State

Brisker (6-foot-1, 206) made 21 begins for the Nittany Lions and had 19 passes defended and 5 interceptions in three seasons. He’s a wise, bodily participant who has the ability set to play a number of roles: within the field, again deep and throughout the slot. Per Brugler, Brisker didn’t commit a single penalty during the last two years. He examined out as a median athlete amongst safeties however confirmed he can run (4.49). Brisker’s instincts and physicality give him upside as a top quality starter.

Once more, sooner or later, the Bears have to acknowledge that their offense wants gamers. However I actually like Brisker for them.

Grade: B+

49. New Orleans Saints: Alontae Taylor, CB, Tennessee

Taylor (6 ft, 199) transitioned from offense to protection throughout his freshman 12 months and ended up beginning 31 video games. He had 19 passes defended and 4 interceptions. Taylor ran 4.36 and examined out as a plus athlete.

Taylor has instruments to work with and is new to the place. However he’ll flip 24 in December, and Brugler had him ranked as his 124th general participant. Taylor might flip into an awesome participant, however this appears like a little bit of a attain.

Grade: C

50. New England Patriots: Tyquan Thornton, WR, Baylor

Thornton (6-foot-2, 181 with 33 1/4-inch arms) has a uncommon mix of dimension and velocity. He ran a 4.28 40 on the mix and caught 62 balls for 948 yards and 10 touchdowns final season.

The Patriots desperately wanted juice/velocity on offense, and Thornton offers them that. The query is whether or not he can persistently beat press protection and turn out to be a extra well-rounded participant. New England is thought for having a shrunken draft board. Brugler had Thornton as his 176th prospect and thought he’d be a fifth-round choose. Possibly Thornton will work out, however this choose appears like a attain.

Grade: C-

51. Philadelphia Eagles: Cam Jurgens, OC, Nebraska

Jurgens (6-foot-3, 303) started his faculty profession at tight finish earlier than transitioning to middle, the place he began 31 video games the previous three seasons. Jurgens examined athletically as the highest inside offensive lineman prospect on this 12 months’s class. And per SIS, he gave up only one sack in his complete faculty profession.

Jurgens is a terrific prospect. The query is whether or not it is a smart use of assets. Jason Kelce was an All-Professional final 12 months and is again in 2022. Meaning Jurgens gained’t see the sector except Kelce suffers an damage. And it’s not just like the Eagles lacked a long-term plan at middle. They simply used a second-round choose on Landon Dickerson final 12 months.

This choose can be extra justifiable if Jurgens had guard/middle versatility. And possibly the Eagles consider that would be the case. However he solely performed middle in faculty. I actually just like the participant however don’t love the usage of assets right here.

Grade: C+

52. Pittsburgh Steelers: George Pickens, WR, Georgia

There’s no denying that Pickens (6-foot-3, 195) has superstar-level traits. He’s a bodily specimen who’s able to overpowering and/or out-running NFL corners. He caught 90 balls for 1,347 yards and 14 touchdowns in 26 faculty video games. Pickens performed simply 63 snaps final 12 months after getting back from a torn ACL he suffered throughout spring practices.

Nevertheless, as coaches described to The Athletic’s Bruce Feldman, there are some “pink flags” with Pickens.

However he lands in a great place right here with a terrific head coach in Mike Tomlin. The Steelers have drafted huge receivers higher than any crew within the league. At 52, this appears like a wise gamble. There won’t be a much bigger boom-or-bust participant within the draft.

Grade: A-

53. Indianapolis Colts: Alec Pierce, WR, Cincinnati

Pierce (6-foot-3, 211) caught 52 balls for 884 yards final season. He ran a 4.41 and averaged 17.5 YPR throughout his profession at Cincinnati. Pierce can play on the surface or as an enormous slot and is a plus athlete.

The Colts’ offense wanted so as to add extra juice/velocity at receiver. Pierce just isn’t a completed product, however he has dimension and velocity to work with. I believe it is a superb use of assets.

Grade: B

54. Kansas Metropolis Chiefs: Skyy Moore, WR, Western Michigan

Moore (5-foot-10, 195) caught 95 balls for 1,292 yards and 10 touchdowns final season. He ran 4.41 and examined out as a plus athlete. Moore performed exterior in faculty however most likely tasks as a slot receiver within the NFL. He has good arms, could make performs after the catch and confirmed a very good understanding in faculty of how you can beat press protection.

The Chiefs wanted pass-catching assist, and Moore appears like a superb match. The very best model of Moore within the NFL would resemble Golden Tate.

Grade: A-

55. Arizona Cardinals: Trey McBride, TE, Colorado State

McBride (6-foot-4, 246) caught 90 balls for 1,121 yards final 12 months. He ran 4.56 and examined as a plus athlete. Brugler referred to as him a aggressive blocker who tasks as a greater model of Hayden Hurst.

The Cardinals’ plan appears to be to load up on pass-catching weapons, however they only signed Zach Ertz to a three-year deal in free company.

They’ve choices to play all types of various personnel groupings, however I’m unsure this was the very best use of assets, given the opposite wants on the roster.

Grade: B-


Trey McBride (Kyle Okita / Cal Sport Media through AP Photographs)

56. Dallas Cowboys: Sam Williams, Edge, Ole Miss

Williams (6-foot-4, 261) had 12.5 sacks and 16 tackles for loss final 12 months. He’s a top-three athlete amongst edge defenders on this class.

However there are severe considerations with Williams. He was suspended from the Ole Miss program in July 2020 following an arrest on felony sexual battery. The fees had been later dropped.

As soon as once more, the Cowboys take a big gamble on a participant with severe off-field considerations.

Grade: C

57. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Luke Goedeke, G/T, Central Michigan

Goedeke (6-foot-5, 312) started his profession at tight finish earlier than transferring to proper deal with, the place he made 24 begins. He most likely tasks as a guard within the NFL.

Goedeke didn’t take part in pre-draft athletic testing due to a hamstring damage. He’s nonetheless comparatively new to offensive line however has potential. Including O-line insurance coverage, particularly if the Bucs consider Goedeke has versatility, is smart for Tampa.

Grade: B

58. Atlanta Falcons: Troy Andersen, LB, Montana State

Andersen (6-foot-4, 243) started his profession as a two-way participant earlier than transitioning full-time to protection the place he made 25 begins at linebacker. He examined as probably the most athletic off-ball linebacker on this 12 months’s draft class and was a two-time captain.

In 15 begins final 12 months, Andersen had 147 tackles (14 for loss), two sacks, 9 passes defended and two interceptions. He wants extra expertise, however given the instruments, Andersen has some upside. It is a cheap use of assets by Atlanta.

Grade: B

59. Minnesota Vikings: Ed Ingram, OG, LSU

Ingram (6-foot-3, 307) began 35 video games for the Tigers — 23 at left guard, 12 at proper guard. Based on PFF, he allowed two sacks and one QB hit on 484 pass-blocking snaps final 12 months. Ingram examined out as a plus athlete.

However there are off-field considerations. Ingram was arrested and charged with two counts of aggravated sexual assault involving a minor in 2018. The fees had been dismissed a 12 months later, and he was reinstated to the soccer crew.

Ingram was ranked No. 114 on Brugler’s massive board.

Grade: C

60. Cincinnati Bengals: Cam Taylor-Britt, CB, Nebraska

Taylor-Britt (5-foot-11, 196) began 29 video games — seven at security and 22 at cornerback. Up to now three seasons, he had six interceptions and 24 passes defended. Taylor-Britt ran 4.38 and examined out as a plus athlete.

I really like what the Bengals have performed with their first two picks. They’ve added two athletic, versatile defensive backs. That’s a very good technique, given the quarterbacks they’ll be going up in opposition to within the AFC.

Grade: B+

61. San Francisco 49ers: Drake Jackson, Edge, USC

Jackson (6-foot-3, 273, 34-inch arms) is an intriguing prospect, and he’ll be enjoying his rookie 12 months at simply 21 years outdated. Jackson had 5 sacks and eight tackles for loss final season. He ranked fifth amongst edge defenders in true strain fee, per SIS.

Jackson is younger, athletic, and the superior stats counsel he was persistently affecting the quarterback when given alternatives final 12 months. The 49ers get a prospect with upside who performs a premium place. That is certainly one of my favourite second-round picks.

Grade: A

62. Kansas Metropolis Chiefs: Bryan Prepare dinner, S, Cincinnati

Prepare dinner (6-foot-1, 206) started his faculty profession enjoying cornerback at Howard earlier than transferring to Cincinnati and changing to security. He began 14 video games final 12 months and had 96 tackles (5 for loss), 11 passes defended and two interceptions.

Per PFF, Prepare dinner logged greater than 150 snaps enjoying deep, within the field and throughout the slot. He graded out as a superb tackler. It is a good addition for Kansas Metropolis.

Grade: B

63. Buffalo Payments: James Prepare dinner, RB, Georgia

Prepare dinner (5-foot-11, 199) carried 230 occasions for 1,503 yards (6.5 YPC) and 14 touchdowns throughout his faculty profession. He additionally caught 67 balls for 730 yards. Per PFF, Prepare dinner had zero drops and nil fumbles final season.

Prepare dinner ran 4.42 and is a home-run hitter who can produce explosive performs as a runner or as a pass-catcher. It is a enjoyable addition for an already explosive Payments offense.

Grade: B

64. Denver Broncos: Nik Bonitto, Edge, Oklahoma

Bonitto (6-foot-3, 248) had 18.5 sacks, 32 tackles for loss and 9 passes defended in 36 video games the previous three seasons.He had the very best strain fee (22%), the very best fast strain fee (12%) and the second-highest true strain fee (23%) amongst edge defenders on this 12 months’s class.

Bonitto ran a 4.54, and his three-cone time ranked within the 76th percentile. I see a flexible edge rusher who can get after the passer and spy cellular quarterbacks. He was certainly one of my favourite Day 2 prospects. I really like this choose for the Broncos.

Grade: A

Spherical 3

65. Jacksonville Jaguars: Luke Fortner, OC, Kentucky

Fortner (6-foot-4, 307) began 36 video games — 20 at proper guard, 13 at middle, three at left guard — throughout his faculty profession. Per PFF, he gave up simply two sacks and one QB hit on 429 pass-blocking snaps final season.

He has a pair issues working in opposition to him. One, Fortner examined out as a below-average athlete. And two, he’ll be a 24-year-old rookie. Having mentioned that, at this level within the draft, it’s superb to make use of picks on versatile offensive linemen.

Grade: B

66. Minnesota Vikings: Brian Asamoah, LB, Oklahoma

Asamoah (6 ft, 226) began 19 video games for the Sooners. Final 12 months, he had 89 tackles however didn’t produce a single move breakup or interception.

He’s an undersized run-and-chase linebacker, and Asamoah examined out as a plus athlete.

Grade: B

67. New York Giants: Joshua Ezeudu, G/T, North Carolina

Ezeudu (6-foot-4, 308 with 34-inch arms) began 28 video games — 20 at left guard, six at left deal with, two at proper deal with. He examined out as a plus athlete.

Brugler had Ezeudu ranked as his one hundred and first prospect, however given his dimension, athleticism and flexibility, I’ve no subject with the Giants taking Ezeudu right here.

Grade: B

68. Cleveland Browns: Martin Emerson, CB, Mississippi State

In 36 video games (28 begins), Emerson (6-foot-2, 201 with 33 1/2-inch arms) had 16 passes defended and one interception. He ran 4.53 and examined out as a below-average athlete amongst corners.

Brugler had Emerson as his 167th-ranked prospect. However the Browns clearly felt like he might match their scheme nicely.

Grade: B-

69. Tennessee Titans: Nicholas Petit-Frere, OT, Ohio State

Petit-Frere (6-foot-5, 316) was a big-time recruit. He began 19 video games — 12 at left deal with, seven at proper deal with — for the Buckeyes. Per PFF, he gave up solely two sacks throughout his faculty profession.

Petit-Frere has the look of an NFL offensive deal with however didn’t fairly put all of it collectively in faculty. Given the upside of hitting on a beginning deal with, I’ve no subject with the Titans taking a swing right here.

Grade: B


Nicholas Petit-Frere (Gregory Shamus / Getty Photographs)

70. Jacksonville Jaguars: Chad Muma, LB, Wyoming

On one hand, there’s so much to love about Muma (6-foot-3, 239). He was a two-time captain who piled up 142 tackles final 12 months to associate with three passes defended and three interceptions. Brugler praised his competitiveness and soccer IQ.

However, what number of linebackers are the Jaguars planning on enjoying at one time? They signed Foyesade Oluokun in free company and traded again into the primary spherical for Devin Lloyd. Now they use this choose on Muma.

I attempt to grade every choose individually, and taking Muma at this spot is completely cheap. I’m simply not fairly positive what the Jaguars’ plan is.

Grade: B

71. Chicago Bears: Velus Jones Jr., WR, Tennessee

Jones (6 ft, 204) had 62 catches for 807 yards and 7 touchdowns final season. He spent six years in faculty — 4 at USC and two extra at Tennessee.

Previous to final season, Jones had by no means had greater than 280 receiving yards in a season.

Jones has wonderful velocity (ran 4.31), however it is a head-scratching choose by the Bears. Jones ranked 182nd on Brugler’s massive board. For a crew with restricted assets, why spend a Day 2 choose on a soon-to-be 25-year-old rookie slot receiver with one 12 months of manufacturing? Possibly Jones will probably be nice, however I don’t get this choose.

Grade: D

72. Seattle Seahawks: Abraham Lucas, OT, Washington State

Lucas (6-foot-6, 315) began 42 video games at proper deal with. He didn’t enable a sack on 477 pass-blocking snaps final season, per PFF. Lucas examined athletically as a top-three offensive deal with on this 12 months’s class.

Lucas is unproven as a run blocker, and groups would possibly view him without any consideration tackle-only possibility. However he has dimension and athleticism to work with. It is a superb use of assets by Seattle.

Grade: B

73. Indianapolis Colts: Jelani Woods, TE, Virginia

Woods (6-foot-7, 253) started his faculty profession as a quarterback at Oklahoma State earlier than making the swap to tight finish. He had 44 catches for 598 yards and eight touchdowns final season at Virginia.

Woods ran 4.61 and examined as the highest athlete amongst tight ends on this 12 months’s class. He held up nicely as a blocker and has drawn comps to Marcedes Lewis.

Woods must be a helpful participant for the Colts, and his athletic testing suggests some upside as a pass-catcher.

Grade: B

74. Atlanta Falcons: Desmond Ridder, QB, Cincinnati

For groups with no quarterback, it’s all about taking swings.

The Athletic’s Nate Tice had Ridder (6-foot-3, 211) as his QB1 on this 12 months’s class. Ridder accomplished 64.9% of his passes final 12 months whereas throwing 30 touchdowns and eight interceptions. He ran 4.52 on the mix and ran for 557 yards final 12 months (excluding sacks).

The query is whether or not Ridder can exhibit the mandatory repetitive accuracy to achieve success. Tice has in contrast the very best model of Ridder to a mixture of Ryan Tannehill and Dak Prescott.

Ridder would possibly by no means flip into even a median starter. However a flier within the third spherical for a crew like Atlanta? That makes good sense.

Grade: B+

75. Houston Texans: Christian Harris, LB, Alabama

Harris (6-foot-1, 226) is undersized, however he began 40 video games in three seasons for Nick Saban, which appears exhausting to do except you’ve excellent intangibles. Final 12 months, Harris had 79 tackes (12.5 for loss), 5.5 sacks and two pressured fumbles. He ran 4.44 and examined out as a top-five athlete amongst linebackers on this 12 months’s class.

Harris can blitz, spy cellular QBs and canopy. Brugler had Harris as his Forty sixth-ranked prospect. I actually like this choose.

Grade: A-

76. Baltimore Ravens: Travis Jones, DT, UConn

Jones (6-foot-4, 325) might find yourself being the Day 2 model of Georgia’s Jordan Davis. He had 47 tackles, 4.5 sacks and seven.5 tackles for loss in 11 begins final 12 months. SIS tracks true strain fee (how typically a participant produces strain on straight dropbacks) and fast strain fee (how typically a participant produces strain in 2.5 seconds or much less). Jones ranked first and third, respectively, in these two classes final 12 months.

When it comes to athletic testing, solely Davis was higher amongst defensive tackles. I like this choose so much for the Ravens.

Grade: A-

77. Indianapolis Colts: Bernhard Raimann, OT, Central Michigan

Raimann (6-foot-6, 303) started his faculty profession as a decent finish and has solely 18 begins of expertise at left deal with. Having mentioned that, he gave up only one sack on greater than 700 pass-blocking snaps, per PFF.

Given his relative inexperience and the truth that he’ll be a 25-year-old rookie, I’m unsure I might have taken Raimann right here. However he performs a premium place, fills a necessity and has upside.

Grade: B

78. Cleveland Browns: Alex Wright, Edge, UAB

Wright (6-foot-5, 271) began 18 video games in three seasons. He had seven sacks and seven.5 tackles for loss final season. His pre-draft testing was restricted after he suffered a strained pectoral muscle benching on the mix.

Wright is a protracted, toolsy edge rusher with upside. It is a superb use of assets by the Browns.

Grade: B

79. Los Angeles Chargers: JT Woods, S, Baylor

Woods (6-foot-2, 195) began 28 video games at Baylor. He had eight passes defended and 6 interceptions final season.

Woods ran 4.36 and is a plus athlete. He wants to enhance as a tackler however has velocity, vary and ball expertise. I’ve no downside taking a flier on a prospect with these traits at this level within the draft.

Grade: B

80. Denver Broncos: Greg Dulcich, TE, UCLA

Dulcich (6-foot-4, 243) is a pass-catching tight finish who’s able to producing explosive performs. He caught 42 balls for 725 yards final season and averaged 17.6 YPR throughout his faculty profession. Dulcich has some shiftiness to his route-running, however his athletic testing (ran 4.69) was considerably disappointing.

The Broncos included Noah Fant within the deal for Russell Wilson. Dulcich has the potential to be a field-stretching tight finish. I like this transfer for Denver.

Grade: B+

81. New York Giants: Cor’Dale Flott, CB, LSU

Flott (6-foot-1, 175) began 21 video games for LSU. In 11 video games final 12 months, he had 12 passes defended, two pressured fumbles and one interception.

Flott has expertise enjoying each exterior and within the slot, and he performs with a feisty demeanor. Total, the measurables (he ran 4.5) are common to beneath common. The identical might be mentioned about his ball manufacturing.

Brugler had Flott ranked 169 on his massive board, however the Giants clearly see a starting-caliber participant.

Grade: B-

82. Atlanta Falcons: DeAngelo Malone, Edge, Western Kentucky

Malone (6-foot-3, 243) spent a very long time in faculty. He had 34 sacks in 62 video games (53 begins). He additionally had 60 tackles for loss, 9 pressured fumbles and eight passes defended.

Malone’s weak point is in opposition to the run, however he has upside as a move rusher. And that’s what the Falcons want. I just like the match, and I just like the choose.

Grade: B+

83. Philadelphia Eagles: Nakobe Dean, LB, Georgia

Dean (5-foot-11, 229) was the captain of the very best protection within the nation final 12 months. He had 72 tackles (10.5 for loss), six sacks, two pressured fumbles, eight passes defended and two interceptions.

Dean is undersized. He didn’t take part in any pre-draft athletic testing. And stories surfaced prior to now 24 hours that he was coping with a pectoral damage.

It’s at all times dangerous to label a choose like this a steal, given what number of groups handed on Dean. However nonetheless, he was Brugler’s Twenty ninth-ranked participant. And Dean’s greatest traits are his tackling, his management and his soccer IQ. He goes to an Eagles crew in determined want of linebacker assist.

We’ll get extra info on why Dean slipped thus far, however at No. 83, it’s exhausting to not like this choose.

Grade: A-

84. Pittsburgh Steelers: DeMarvin Leal, DT, Texas A&M

Leal (6-foot-4, 283) had 8.5 sacks and 12.5 tackles for loss final 12 months. He was a big-time recruit who flashed upside however by no means fairly put all of it collectively.

I just like the slot in Pittsburgh, the place he’ll be part of a bunch of completed veterans. Given his upside as a disruptive inside lineman, Leal coming off the board right here makes loads of sense.

Grade: A-


DeMarvin Leal (Jerome Miron / USA At this time)

 

85. New England Patriots: Marcus Jones, CB, Houston

Jones (5-foot-8, 174) began 27 video games in faculty. In 13 video games final 12 months, he had 18 passes defended and 5 interceptions.

Jones is undersized, however he’s a aggressive nook who has ball expertise and may cowl. And Jones was a prolific returner at Houston. His ability set ought to match nicely in Invoice Belichick’s protection and on New England’s particular groups. I like this choose.

Grade: B+

86. Tennessee Titans: Malik Willis, QB, Liberty

Quarterback selections within the present NFL panorama come all the way down to upside. And the very best model of Willis (6-foot-1, 219) is healthier than the very best model of the opposite quarterbacks on this class.

Willis accomplished 62.8% of his passes in faculty with 48 touchdowns and 18 interceptions. He ran for 1,227 yards (if we exclude sacks) final 12 months and averaged 8.4 YPC. Willis is a toolsy prospect and a dynamic athlete with a powerful arm.

Willis is much from a completed product, and there will probably be rising pains. He took 51 sacks in 13 begins final 12 months. The truth that he lasted this lengthy is telling.

However the Titans might be affected person. They’ve Ryan Tannehill for 2022 however are usually not tied to him past that. It’d by no means work out with Willis, however this looks like a worthy swing to take.

Grade: A-

87. Arizona Cardinals: Cameron Thomas, Edge/DL, San Diego State

Thomas (6-foot-4, 267) began 34 video games and was extremely productive final 12 months with 11.5 sacks and 20.5 tackles for loss. He has the flexibility to line up at defensive finish on base downs and swing inside on apparent passing conditions.

The Cardinals wanted so as to add move rush after having misplaced Chandler Jones in free company. I like this match.

Grade: B+

88. Dallas Cowboys: Jalen Tolbert, WR, South Alabama

Tolbert (6-foot-1, 194) had a prolific faculty profession, catching 178 balls for 3,140 yards and 22 touchdowns whereas averaging 17.6 YPR. He ran 4.49 and examined out as a median athlete amongst huge receivers.

Tolbert’s greatest probability for fulfillment will probably be to carve out a task as an out of doors receiver who can stretch the sector vertically. At this level within the draft, Tolbert was an inexpensive choice for Dallas.

Grade: B

89. Buffalo Payments: Terrel Bernard, LB, Baylor

In 45 video games for Baylor, Bernard (6-foot-1, 224) had 317 tackles (31.5 for loss), 16.5 sacks, 12 passes defended and three interceptions.

He was a captain final 12 months however battled via a variety of accidents in his profession, together with (per Brugler) a fractured shoulder, a torn labrum, a damaged proper hand and a damaged foot.

Bernard is undersized, however he has the potential to develop right into a starter if he can keep wholesome.

Grade: B

90. Las Vegas Raiders: Dylan Parham, G/C, Memphis

Parham (6-foot-3, 311) began 51 video games — 28 at left guard, 12 at proper guard, 11 at proper deal with — prior to now 4 seasons. Per PFF, he didn’t enable a sack on 545 move block snaps final season.

Parham examined nicely athletically and was the 72nd-ranked prospect on Brugler’s board. Given his versatility, this choose makes a whole lot of sense for the Raiders.

Grade: B+

91. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Rachaad White, RB, Arizona State

White (6 ft, 214) carried 224 occasions for 1,426 yards (6.4 YPC) and 20 touchdowns within the final two years. He additionally caught 51 balls for 607 yards.

White is an excellent athlete and must be a pleasant complementary again for the Bucs who’s able to making performs within the passing recreation.

Grade: B

92. Inexperienced Bay Packers: Sean Rhyan, OG, UCLA

Rhyan (6-foot-5, 321) began 31 video games at left deal with for the Bruins. He allowed only one sack on 451 pass-blocking snaps final 12 months, per PFF.

Rhyan didn’t miss a recreation in his profession and improved after beginning as a real freshman in 2019. Brugler tasks him to make the swap to protect within the NFL. It is a superb use of a third-round choose by the Packers.

Grade: B

93. San Francisco 49ers: Tyrion Davis-Value, RB, LSU

Davis-Value (6 ft, 211) carried 211 occasions for 1,003 yards (4.8 YPC) and 6 touchdowns final season. He wasn’t a lot of an element as a pass-catcher (10 catches for 64 yards).

Throughout his three-year profession, Davis-Value averaged simply 4.6 YPC. On condition that he tasks as a two-down again and that the 49ers have restricted draft capital, I don’t love the usage of assets right here.

Grade: C

94. Carolina Panthers: Matt Corral, QB, Ole Miss

Corral (6-foot-2, 212) accomplished 67.9% of his passes with 20 touchdowns and 5 interceptions final season. He additionally ran for 773 yards (excluding sacks).

Corral performs with a aggressive, fiery persona, however that may result in him absorbing pointless contact, which may very well be a significant downside within the NFL. Determination-making and ball safety may be points. Corral had seven intentional groundings and eight fumbles final 12 months, per Brugler.

I most popular Malik Willis and Desmond Ridder to Corral, however scouting quarterbacks is difficult. And if you don’t have a man, you need to be taking swings like this. Even when it doesn’t work out, this course of is smart for Carolina.

Grade: B+

95. Cincinnati Bengals: Zachary Carter, DT, Florida

Carter (6-foot-4, 282) had eight sacks and 11 tackles for loss final 12 months. He began 25 video games in his profession and lined up in a number of spots alongside the defensive position.

Opinions can fluctuate on prospects, however Brugler noticed Carter as a considerably restricted participant and had him ranked 220th on his massive board. This appears like a little bit of a attain for Cincinnati.

Grade: C+

96. Indianapolis Colts: Nick Cross, S, Maryland

Cross (6 ft, 212) began 21 video games for the Terps. He had 18 passes defended and 6 interceptions in three seasons.

Cross is a younger prospect (turns 21 in September) and examined as the very best athlete amongst safeties on this 12 months’s class.

He won’t contribute instantly, however Cross has the instruments and flexibility to develop right into a starter. I actually just like the swing on upside right here.

Grade: A-

97. Detroit Lions: Kerby Joseph, S, Illinois

Joseph (6-foot-1, 203) began 10 video games at free security final season and had 5 interceptions to associate with seven passes defended.

He selected to not run on the mix after which was coping with a hamstring damage at his professional day.

Joseph tasks as a rangy security with ball expertise. It is a superb choose at this spot for Detroit.

Grade: B

98. Washington Commanders: Brian Robinson Jr., RB, Alabama

Robinson carried 545 occasions for two,704 yards (5.0 YPC) and 29 touchdowns throughout his 5 seasons at Alabama. He additionally caught 52 balls for 446 yards.

Robinson is a bodily, downhill again. He didn’t carry the load till 2021 and figures to be a complementary again in Washington.

Grade: B-


Brian Robinson Jr. (Kevin C. Cox / Getty Photographs)

99. Cleveland Browns: David Bell, WR, Purdue

Bell (6-foot-1, 212) was a prolific receiver final 12 months, ending with 93 catches for 1,286 yards and 6 touchdowns.

The query with Bell is whether or not he’ll move the athletic thresholds essential to beat NFL corners. He ran 4.65 and and didn’t depend on athleticism or explosiveness at Purdue.

Bell will lean on his smarts, savvy and toughness within the NFL. He may very well be an choice to contribute instantly as a slot receiver.

Grade: B

100. Arizona Cardinals: Myjai Sanders, Edge, Cincinnati

Sanders (6-foot-5, 228) had 13.5 sacks, 24 tackles for loss and 13 passes defended in 48 faculty video games.

Per Brugler, scouts had questions on Sanders’ weight fluctuation. He weighed 228 on the mix and 247 at his professional day. Sanders was referred to as for twenty-four penalties within the final three seasons, together with 9 offsides flags final 12 months alone. He turns 24 in July.Sanders has some apparent components working in opposition to him, however at this level within the draft, taking a flier on a toolsy move rusher is ok.

Grade: C+

101. New York Jets: Jeremy Ruckert, TE, Ohio State

Ruckert (6-foot-5, 252) began 16 video games for the Buckeyes. He had 26 catches for 309 yards and three touchdowns final season.

Ruckert was not a prolific pass-catcher at any level throughout his faculty profession, however he possesses the ability set required — each as a blocker and receiver — to develop right into a starter within the NFL.

Grade: B

102. Miami Dolphins: Channing Tindall, LB, Georgia

Tindall (6-foot-2, 230) didn’t begin a recreation in faculty. However he nonetheless performed 474 snaps final 12 months and had 67 tackles (7.5 for loss) and 5.5 sacks.

Tindall ran a 4.47 and examined athletically as one of many prime 5 linebackers on this 12 months’s class.

It is a superb choose at this level within the draft.

Grade: B+

103. Kansas Metropolis Chiefs: Leo Chenal, LB, Wisconsin

Chenal (6-foot-3, 250) has a pair issues going for him. One, he was extremely productive final 12 months with 115 tackles (18.5 for loss), eight sacks and two pressured fumbles. Two, he ran 4.53 and examined out because the second-best athlete amongst this class of linebackers.

Chenal’s movie suggests a downhill thumper. If he can enhance in protection or discover a function as a blitzer in passing conditions, he has an opportunity to develop right into a three-down participant.

Grade: B+

104. Los Angeles Rams: Logan Bruss, OG, Wisconsin

Bruss (6-foot-5, 309) began 35 video games — 26 at proper deal with, six at proper guard and three at tight finish. He didn’t enable a sack in 2021 or 2020, in response to PFF.

O-line guru Brandon Thorn compared Bruss to former Rams guard Austin Corbett.

Taking a shot on a flexible offensive lineman who carried out nicely in faculty and is a satisfactory athlete makes loads of sense right here.

Grade: B

105. San Francisco 49ers: Danny Grey, WR, SMU

Grey (6 ft, 186) had 49 catches for 803 yards and 9 touchdowns in 10 video games final 12 months. He ran a 4.33 on the mix and is a plus athlete.

Grey had points with drops (seven final season) and missed a number of video games due to accidents in every of the previous two years.

However the 49ers may benefit from a specialised huge receiver who can run and stretch the sector. Grey has the potential to provide them that.

Grade: B+

(Illustration: Wes McCabe / The Athletic; photograph: Ben Liebenberg through Related Press)


I hope the article virtually 2022 NFL Draft grades for each Spherical 2 and three choose, together with an A for 49ers and D for Bears provides perspicacity to you and is beneficial for rely to your data

admin
admin